There's an interesting conflict in the wired article here - it claims the photo to be a selfie taken by the animal (and I'm assuming Indian copyright law would

There's an interesting conflict in the wired article here - it claims the photo to be a selfie taken by the animal (and I'm assuming Indian copyright law would similarly classify animal-taken photos as non-copyrightable) but then later on refers to them as "his photos" (presumably referring to the main image in the article).