4 ms·

You argue that the definition of faith is to (trust, believe, have faith) in something despite not knowing. We agree in the main. My point is one of where we

You argue that the definition of faith is to (trust, believe, have faith) in something despite not knowing. We agree in the main. My point is one of where we put the emphasis. My counterargument, if it is one, is simply that when humans actually have faith in something, it's almost always "trusting what I don't know is going on, because of what I know of this object in other circumstances". The husband "trusts" his wife to be faithful, not because he has a tracker on her and so knows where she goes at all hours, but because he knows who she is when she's with him. A soldier "has faith in" in the general's battle plan because of the general's past victories. I'm just arguing that all the really useful definitions of faith imply that the trust is actually rooted in knowledge and past experience, not merely blind, hopeful, stick-your-fingers-in-your-ears-and-sing-la-la-la ignorance of reality.

jdmichal 10y ago
Ah, I see. I don't think I necessarily agree with that definition of faith. For two reasons: 1. I don't think it serves much purpose if it's directly synonymous with trust. 2. Such a definition of faith runs directly against the definition of agnosticism, which asserts that such knowledge is unattainable. I think the word faith brings to the table much of the denotation of trust, but with the connotation of doing it despite not knowing. After all, there are many husbands who find their wife cheating. There are many soldiers that end up dead, despite the best general's most careful planning. There's a level of the unknowable in all these scenarios, and faith is the continuation of belief in the face of these unknowns. Or, put this way: The saying is that "trust is something earned". It's earned through proof of intention via past experience. I think faith removes this "earning" step -- it's trust without necessarily being earned.

jdmichal 10y ago

Ah, I see. I don't think I necessarily agree with that definition of faith. For two reasons: 1. I don't think it serves much purpose if it's directly synonymous with trust. 2. Such a definition of faith runs directly against the definition of agnosticism, which asserts that such knowledge is unattainable. I think the word faith brings to the table much of the denotation of trust, but with the connotation of doing it despite not knowing. After all, there are many husbands who find their wife cheating. There are many soldiers that end up dead, despite the best general's most careful planning. There's a level of the unknowable in all these scenarios, and faith is the continuation of belief in the face of these unknowns. Or, put this way: The saying is that "trust is something earned". It's earned through proof of intention via past experience. I think faith removes this "earning" step -- it's trust without necessarily being earned.