3 ms·
I don't know why you'd want to base your preference for something intended to provoke an emotional reaction on "quantifiable objective data". That's like saying
by beat 10y ago
I don't know why you'd want to base your preference for something intended to provoke an emotional reaction on "quantifiable objective data". That's like saying I shouldn't love my wife because there are other women who are thinner.
Nobody is saying "If you actually knew what you were doing, you'd want to shoot film for everything." Someone is, in fact, saying "The only reason to shoot film is because you're a pretentious hipster". Who's being judgmental here?
- Turing_Machine 10y ago"Nobody is saying "If you actually knew what you were doing, you'd want to shoot film for everything." " Well, except for the original poster to whom I was replying. That's a pretty good paraphrase of what he said.
- beat 10y agoAnd likewise, "The only reason to shoot film is because you're a pretentious hipster" is a pretty good paraphrase for your response. And I was the OP. I know what I said, and you paraphrased it terribly. If I thought people should shoot film for everything, I'd do it myself. Instead, film is maybe 2-3% of my output.