>The solution is to have user interfaces that are forgiving and don't punish the user for making a mistake. Meaning ignoring input? Which in turn would sugges

>The solution is to have user interfaces that are forgiving and don't punish the user for making a mistake. Meaning ignoring input? Which in turn would suggest scrapping features to mitigate mistakes. Which would mean not a professional tool. I'm not arguing with your statement on its own, but I highly disagree in this context. In any professional tool I use, I want a 1:1 representation of _EVERYTHING_ I do. The thought of a tool treating me like an idiot (which I am) but correcting me (according to ITS OWN LOGIC) and not letting me learn (which I can) is making me furious to even consider.