3 ms·
I think it's generally accepted that he's not all good, and like many, not all bad either. I'm sure there's a littany of other grievances large and small but o
by astrodust 10y ago
I think it's generally accepted that he's not all good, and like many, not all bad either.
I'm sure there's a littany of other grievances large and small but on the whole he's not predominantly a bad guy.
Just as we shouldn't make him out to be some kind of saint who could do no wrong we shouldn't vilify him for the many mistakes he made. The way you're beating on this drum sure sounds a lot like what he did was so monstrous it overshadowed his work.
He's no Roman Polaniski, Woody Allen or Bill Cosby where the transgressions are so severe you'd want the person shunned, their work permanently stained by their horrible actions. He was a dick, he was difficult, he was emotionally demanding and verbally abusive, for that he'll always be guilty, but as far as anyone's been willing to divulge he never crossed that line to something violent or irreparably dark.
- adrienne 10y agoThe fact that tech believes in visionaries - in people who are unique such that their shitty behavior must be excused, for years, so that their "work" gets done - is the main problem with tech, frankly.
- astrodust 10y agoHe was exceptionally difficult to work with. He didn't rape or kill anyone. He didn't sexually abuse people. Seriously, get a grip. The problem with tech is that behaviour way, way worse than what Jobs ever did is given a free pass. The problem is not Jobs.