3 ms·
I agree, though the fact still remains that most funding will go to novel (and yes, important) scientific research rather than civilization-saving (and way more
by gooseus 10y ago
I agree, though the fact still remains that most funding will go to novel (and yes, important) scientific research rather than civilization-saving (and way more important) asteroid defense.
On the importance... if human civilization discovers the precise nature of the cosmos and no one is around in 100 years capable of learning about it, does it matter?
Given the current political and social climate I think it's a lot more pragmatic to learn how to organize and preserve our knowledge such that it's as easily decoded and readily available as possible on as large a timescale as we can manage.
- dTal 10y agoI'll quote one of the most insightful comments I've read on HN: "Most of our physical tech stack is read-only executable code: there isn't a civilizational "source code" that shows from first principles how to build up to our current technology layer. For that matter, not even from first principles to turn of the 20th century technology level." (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12824828 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12824828)
- halspero 10y agoHere is James Burke on this topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeROEoimj7I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeROEoimj7I And here's Primitive Technology man: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAL3JXZSzSm8AlZyD3nQdBA https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAL3JXZSzSm8AlZyD3nQdBA (Should we leave his videos lying around on clockwork tablets?)