The line you quoted was written because I wanted to focus on a different part of a faulty reasoning chain. I wanted to step over it entirely without agreeing o

The line you quoted was written because I wanted to focus on a different part of a faulty reasoning chain. I wanted to step over it entirely without agreeing or disagreeing. For what it's worth, I think it's a massively erroneous assumption. But it's also one I'm not particularly interested in discussing in the context of this thread.