The biggest problem with this is the lack of any real supporting evidence for it's claim. As far as I can tell, it relies purely on anecdotal evidence from rec

The biggest problem with this is the lack of any real supporting evidence for it's claim. As far as I can tell, it relies purely on anecdotal evidence from recruiters presented as fact, rather than any actual numbers. What was the percentage of diversity candidates before and after the program started? What % of those candidates made it through the initial interview phase in relation to white and asian men? What % of diversity candidates were rejected by these committees compared to other candidates? Without this information, all this article does is to re-affirm that Facebook has a diversity problem, but fails to make a credible argument that these committees are responsible for it.