4 ms·
Isn't your statement a bit fallacious? The animals that couldn't "solve problems" aren't exactly around for us to study. The difference between the two comes do
by eduren 10y ago
Isn't your statement a bit fallacious? The animals that couldn't "solve problems" aren't exactly around for us to study. The difference between the two comes down to luck doesn't it? The animal that survives is far more likely to have done the right thing by random mutation rather than some weird semi-intelligence that you are attributing to them.
- Koshkin 10y agoSure, but it's the end result that matters. Incidentally, the human brain also has evolved by natural selection (which involves random mutation).