3 ms·
I like caddy, but the dreamhost benchmark re apache vs nginx isn't really telling, as it doesn't mention fundamental apache config properties. I'm assuming they
by tannhaeuser 10y ago
I like caddy, but the dreamhost benchmark re apache vs nginx isn't really telling, as it doesn't mention fundamental apache config properties. I'm assuming they were benchmarking an unoptimized MPM/prefork setup, but you can use event-based request processing (and other process models) with apache as well. There's nothing magical with nginx.
I'd also like to see a benchmark vs. H2O which seems to have the most advanced HTTP/2 support right now (its running the nghttp2 web site for some time now).
- bwblabs 10y agoAny experiences with running h2o on production sites? The documentation is a bit lacking sometimes, luckily the code is well written.
- n1try 10y agoI'd be interested in such experiences, too. H2O look promising at first sight.
- tannhaeuser 10y agoNo experience with h2o yet. I'm not keen on having to pickup Ruby which would be just one more thing to take care of for me.
- bwblabs 10y agoThe code is mainly written in C (https://github.com/h2o/h2o https://github.com/h2o/h2o) with some Perl testing. The Mruby for small (header/push) logic isn't that bad, and not bad in terms of performance either (https://h2o.examp1e.net/configure/mruby.html https://h2o.examp1e.net/configure/mruby.html), although I'm also not a Ruby fan.