3 ms·

It looks like they have added it now. I wonder if they were slow on updating their site because of Sourcetree, which I personally love (especially since it is

It looks like they have added it now. I wonder if they were slow on updating their site because of Sourcetree, which I personally love (especially since it is a cross-platoform [Mac/Win] GUI client).

akjainaj 10y ago
No they haven't... I just checked. No syntax highlighting for diffs.
- disposition2 10y ago
  Hmm, they show up for me [1]. That screenshot is an HTML file but I also looked at JS, Python and Markdown and all were showing syntax highlight in diff commits. 1. https://i.imgur.com/Av70r03.png https://i.imgur.com/Av70r03.png
  - noxToken 10y ago
    You can't claim that Bitbucket has syntax highlighting and then post proof that isn't actually proof. Well you can, but why bother? I just checked our Bitbucket. There's no syntax highlighting for any of our used languages for diffs. There is no option to enable or disable it. When you do a search for it, it's still an open issue in BitBucket's public issue tracker[0]. If you've got some wizardry working that isn't an external script, hook it up. [0]: https://bitbucket.org/site/master/issues/8673/add-syntax-highlighting-to-commits-pull https://bitbucket.org/site/master/issues/8673/add-syntax-hig...
  - evan_ 10y ago
    this isn't syntax highlighting, it's highlighting the diff add/removes. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b0b9b3df27d100a975b4e8818f35382b64a5e35c#diff-983ac52fa16631c1e1dfa28fc593d2efL3068 https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b0b9b3df27d100a975b... syntax highlighting would be like this, where keywords, function calls, and variables are all different colors.
    - deleted 10y ago
      [deleted]
    - disposition2 10y ago
      Thank you for clarifying. I'm not sure why I didn't initially associate 'syntax highlighting' with what it is. I can see how this would be useful when dealing with a lot of information, especially when reviewing another's work.

It looks like they have added it now. I wonder if they were slow on updating their site because of Sourcetree, which I personally love (especially since it is a cross-platoform [Mac/Win] GUI client).

akjainaj 10y ago

No they haven't... I just checked. No syntax highlighting for diffs.

disposition2 10y ago
Hmm, they show up for me [1]. That screenshot is an HTML file but I also looked at JS, Python and Markdown and all were showing syntax highlight in diff commits. 1. https://i.imgur.com/Av70r03.png https://i.imgur.com/Av70r03.png
- noxToken 10y ago
  You can't claim that Bitbucket has syntax highlighting and then post proof that isn't actually proof. Well you can, but why bother? I just checked our Bitbucket. There's no syntax highlighting for any of our used languages for diffs. There is no option to enable or disable it. When you do a search for it, it's still an open issue in BitBucket's public issue tracker[0]. If you've got some wizardry working that isn't an external script, hook it up. [0]: https://bitbucket.org/site/master/issues/8673/add-syntax-highlighting-to-commits-pull https://bitbucket.org/site/master/issues/8673/add-syntax-hig...
- evan_ 10y ago
  this isn't syntax highlighting, it's highlighting the diff add/removes. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b0b9b3df27d100a975b4e8818f35382b64a5e35c#diff-983ac52fa16631c1e1dfa28fc593d2efL3068 https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b0b9b3df27d100a975b... syntax highlighting would be like this, where keywords, function calls, and variables are all different colors.
  - deleted 10y ago
    [deleted]
  - disposition2 10y ago
    Thank you for clarifying. I'm not sure why I didn't initially associate 'syntax highlighting' with what it is. I can see how this would be useful when dealing with a lot of information, especially when reviewing another's work.