5 ms·
> Obama decided not to make the accusation public before the election so as not to be seen as influencing the election. That's one way to put it. Another would
by draw_down 10y ago
> Obama decided not to make the accusation public before the election so as not to be seen as influencing the election.
That's one way to put it. Another would be to say that he and others thought Clinton was going to win, i.e., that the hacking wasn't a big deal. Now it is. This is one reason Dems do not have credibility on this issue- either it's a problem for our democracy or it isn't, regardless of the winner.
Another reason is Dems poured cold water on the idea that the election's outcome could be illegitimate, back when trump was saying he'd contest the result if he lost. Now the shoe is on the other foot and Dems are stuck trying to declare the result illegitimate.
Personally, I doubt the strength of the effect this had on the result of the election, and the Dems bungled it themselves by running a bad campaign and a poor candidate. Now they want to point the finger elsewhere.
- jeeva 10y ago>That's one way to put it. Another would be to say that he and others thought Clinton was going to win, If I see someone trying to do something shady, and don't think they'll succeed, I'd surely care less than if I see someone doing it and they manage to have an effect. Also, hindsight is often said to be easier than predicting the future.
- AnimalMuppet 10y agoIn particular, with Trump saying that he wouldn't accept the results of the election if he lost, saying that there was foreign influence trying to tip the election could have been rather dangerous.