2 ms·
Anar-caps have always been separated from anarchists. I don't know why they took this name -they were in quite an identity crisis about it [1]-. A better name c
by pyrale 10y ago
Anar-caps have always been separated from anarchists. I don't know why they took this name -they were in quite an identity crisis about it [1]-. A better name could be stateless capitalists.
[1] Murray Rothbard, "Are libertarian anarchists" : https://mises.org/library/are-libertarians-anarchists https://mises.org/library/are-libertarians-anarchists
- em3rgent0rdr 10y agoActually anarcho-capitalism permits anarcho-communist, anarcho-syndicalist, and mutualist enclaves (in addition to any voluntary organization) within of a polycentric legal order. It is the most inclusive variety of anarchism.
- pyrale 10y agoAnar-caps permit any other form of anarchism - provided you own land. Statism permits any other form of government - provided you pay taxes and respect the law.
- em3rgent0rdr 10y agoYou don't actually have to own the land...You could rent the land or hold the land as a collective.
- pyrale 10y agoYeah, if someone is willing to enter a contract with you, which they are free to decline. Anyhow, beyond the mere principle of having to be part of a system you reject, it is quite weird to say that any anarchist could live in an anar-cap utopia, when there are such differences between them ; just like it would be weird to say that any anarchy can fully develop as a community within a statist society.
- em3rgent0rdr 10y agoUnder US form of government, it is not permitted to have multiple overlapping anarchist legal orders, unless the system was radically reformed.