3 ms·

Thanks. I am considering doing a new piece because I get a lot of flack over details like that while people generally seem to miss the point relevant to our liv

by Mz 10y ago

Thanks. I am considering doing a new piece because I get a lot of flack over details like that while people generally seem to miss the point relevant to our lives today that DPC is a legal alternative under the ACA and a genuinely better solution. I am frustrated and not sure what I need to do differently to get that across effectively. Edit: Feel free to nitpick this version: http://micheleincalifornia.blogspot.com/2017/01/direct-primary-care-real-alternative.html http://micheleincalifornia.blogspot.com/2017/01/direct-prima... Maybe I shall eventually get it right (just in time for the law to change under Trump). Thank you.

uiri 10y ago
Sorry, I didn't mean for my comment to be taken as a criticism of the overall piece but rather a nitpick of that particular paragraph. I agree that separating disaster/catastrophic coverage (ie: insurance ) from routine things like doctor visits (ie: health care ) is a good thing. I was aware of HDHP and HSA for the former but I did not know about DPC until you brought it to my attention with this comment thread. Thank you.
- Mz 10y ago
  It was written somewhat off the cuff and I did frame it as "as I understand it." I was just trying to give some general historical background for why the US has gotten to where it is currently, even though what we currently do is incredibly broken. I don't know why I seem to inspire this kind of reaction in people, and maybe it isn't "me" per se, but I seem to get this a lot. And I am genuinely interested in figuring out if it is really something I do that I can somehow change. Thank you for engaging me in meaty discussion. Best.