4 ms·
Thats not true. Techdirt https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20161019/07004935835/cnn-tells-viewers-illegal-them-to-read-wikileaks-document-dumps-cnn-is-wrong.s
by rokosbasilisk 10y ago
Thats not true.
Techdirt
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20161019/07004935835/cnn-tells-viewers-illegal-them-to-read-wikileaks-document-dumps-cnn-is-wrong.shtml https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20161019/07004935835/cnn-t...
washington examiner
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/cnn-anchor-warns-illegal-for-you-to-look-at-wikileaks/article/2604697 http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/cnn-anchor-warns-illegal-f...
a link to him saying it.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Jww8pOdPZpM https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Jww8pOdPZpM
observer articles explain rigging and cnn assistance
https://www.google.com/amp/observer.com/2016/07/latest-guccifer-2-0-leak-reaffirms-primaries-were-rigged-for-clinton/amp/?client=ms-android-att-us https://www.google.com/amp/observer.com/2016/07/latest-gucci...
https://www.google.com/amp/observer.com/2016/11/mainstream-media-recap-who-colluded-with-the-clinton-campaign/amp/?client=ms-android-att-us https://www.google.com/amp/observer.com/2016/11/mainstream-m...
fox news
https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/12/bias-alert-wikileaks-exposes-medias-secret-support-clinton.amp.html?client=ms-android-att-us https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/...
- hackuser 10y agoI don't know Techdirt, but the others are outlets of the conservative ideological movement. I'm not sure what the Observer article has to do with the issue at hand?
- rokosbasilisk 10y agoIts shows examples of media collusion. If you ignore "conservative media", you may be just trapped in your filter bubble. Its clear this is not a good faith discussion. I voted for Bernie with many other college kids, and we abstained from voting in the presidential when fox news gave us more objective coverage at the dnc protests. It was an truely awakening experience for many of us. just my two cents.
- hackuser 10y agoIt's sad that you have turned a discussion into personal attacks; I'm not going to participate in that.