5 ms·
To encourage counter-arguments, one ought to make the original argument concrete and objective. Making a post to argue against a paragraph of snubs and the uns
by mquander 16y ago
To encourage counter-arguments, one ought to make the original argument concrete and objective. Making a post to argue against a paragraph of snubs and the unsupported statement that X is just a "far better programming experience" than Y feels to me like getting trolled, not like having an argument.
- jacquesm 16y agoYes, but your own counter argument is based on a feeling, that's not much more solid than what Ricardo said to begin with, it is also unsupported, or at best anecdotal. None of this based on objective facts or stuff that you could measure. His truth to me is as good as your truth. But he got modded in to the ground and you got modded up.
- mquander 16y agoI know. I didn't intend mine as a counter-argument, but just as background for why I felt it was flamebait -- I have experience that indicates to me it's not credible to just uncategorically state that one is "far better." Like I expressed, it doesn't seem like there was much of an argument to make a counter-argument to. I wouldn't have modded me up, either; in fact, I would have modded me down, because this whole discussion is off-topic and doesn't deserve attention. I think the majority of moderation on here seems awful and is rarely even vaguely proportional to the quality of the comments, and I agree that this is an example of awful moderation. So you're arguing with the wrong fellow. EDIT: I amended my comment above to be irritating and sarcastic toward people who modded me up.
- jacquesm 16y ago> EDIT: I amended my comment above to be irritating and sarcastic toward people who modded me up. Classy! My email is in my profile by the way, in case you ever want to take something 'offline'.