3 ms·
I wish the PhantomJS project was more upfront about the version of Qt (and therefore Webkit) that ships with each version, like they are in this email. That inf
by nathancahill 10y ago
I wish the PhantomJS project was more upfront about the version of Qt (and therefore Webkit) that ships with each version, like they are in this email. That information is very hard to track down otherwise, and I think it's the most crucial part of each release (since feature support in Phantom tends to lag browsers by several years).
Additionally, it would be cool for sites like caniuse or MDN to track Qt Webkit feature support as well.
- mnutt 10y agoI built QtWebKit with roughly the same version used for Phantom 2.5, here's the support from html5test.com: https://rm891swy536139ttwzee.mnutt.sandcats.io/853e0e85-170e-4282-a447-c72633854edf.png https://rm891swy536139ttwzee.mnutt.sandcats.io/853e0e85-170e... I specifically left out some audio/video support from my build because I didn't need it. And Qt 5.8 will be released this month with HTTP/2 support.