3 ms·
It's not that it's not the easiest place. It's that it's impossible. If you have a minimum required staffing level, there is no scope for savings from increased
by ascorbic 10y ago
It's not that it's not the easiest place. It's that it's impossible. If you have a minimum required staffing level, there is no scope for savings from increased productivity. They might be able to accomplish all their tasks better in half the time, but they'd still need to pay someone else to be on site for the rest of the time.
- hanspragt 10y agoIf impossibility was a foregone conclusion, why try it in the first place? I appluad them for doing the study in this place.