The post lacks the term "CSPRNG", which I would have thought to be there in a discussion about randomness. Especially in collaboration with the concept of secur

The post lacks the term "CSPRNG", which I would have thought to be there in a discussion about randomness. Especially in collaboration with the concept of security. The long story short, a Pseudorandom sequence can be more than enough in a security setting, provided that the stream of bits follow certain rules. For instance, it should be impossible to guess the next bit based on known history of bits. If /dev/urandom is backed by such a generator, which it is in many modern operating systems, then it is arguably safer than what the claim of the post is.