11 ms·
Desktop Operating System Market Share
- AJAlabs 10y agoIt's interesting to see that there are more Windows XP users than there are Mac OS X users running all versions combined.
- Razengan 10y agoI wonder how it would look like if we ignored pirated copies (i.e. pretty much most of Asia, Africa and the Middle East) and server versions.
- izacus 10y agoWhat would be the point of that?
- awinder 10y agoNot to speak for the original poster but as a dev I'd like to know what my addressable market is if I'm developing a desktop-focused app, and excluding biz machines and people who will never pay would help there
- bostand 10y agoWell, a significant number of osx machines in those places are mackintoshes' :) Not that it changes anything
- izacus 10y agoIf you're developing an app you need to figure out addressable market separately for it anyway. None of the apps I've developed until now really have the same % as any of those graphs - your audience will vary with the use-case. The only thing the original proposal would do is make Apple look better, but it wouldn't really be USEFUL for anything.
- scholia 10y agoThat's because there are still a lot of XP users in SE Asia, and particularly in China. Netmarketshare doesn't divulge country numbers unless you are a paying customer. Netmarketshare also "balances" its numbers, so the results could vary a lot according to how much weight it gives to China.
- herbst 10y agoInteresting side note: ive only swen Windows 7 discs so far on markets in SEA. Even cambodia seems win7 dominated. But they also sell cheap laptops with mint on them.
- protomikron 10y agoEven all Mac OS X and Linux combined is less than Windows XP. Think about that.
- tantalor 10y agoWhere is Chrome OS? Part of Linux?
- achamayou 10y agoProbably others, since the User-Agent doesn't mention Linux and contains "CrOS" instead.
- headcanon 10y agoI have a feeling this is skewed by massive enterprise purchasing of workstations - they will naturally gravitate towards a stable windows version, and tend not to get upgraded very often. I'd like to see a chart of desktop computer market share that people purchase for themselves.
- hota_mazi 10y agoEven so, that "massive enterprise purchasing" would be dwarfed by the number of computers bought for personal use.
- kobeya 10y ago... citation required? With windows terminals on every office desk, every point of sale station, every library computer room, etc. I don't think it is inconceivable that "enterprise" purchasing outnumbers personal purchases.
- jasonlotito 10y agoSo does the original claim. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
- akiselev 10y agoDepending on the industry, a lot of your tools might not just be Windows only but also tied to an old (and possibly unsupported in the case of XP) version. This is endemic to any industry involving capital equipment like machining centers or biotech lab equipment that have serviceable lifetimes measured in the decades. A decade ago this wasn't really a problem because this equipment was isolated but now with industrial IoT and modern IT networks they're becoming more and more vulnerable. One mom and pop machine shop I ordered from got tired of using USB drives to haul CAD files and machining instructions between systems so they started using Google Apps with Drive as the sharing mechanism. In order to do that, they had to hook up several 10 year old Windows XP machines to the internet and within weeks they got hit by the blaster worm or some other pre-SP1 virus. That cost them weeks of machine time on their older CNCs and hundreds of man hours doing incident reports for their bigger clients like the defense contractors. The situation in the clinical biotech companies I worked at was never that bad because of HIPPA compliance and more focus on networked services like lab databases but still atrocious. So much of our industrial infrastructure is built on a house of cards.
- mariobertschler 10y agoNotable: there are almost 3x more Windows NT devices online than Mac OS X 10.8
- mattnewton 10y agoIs that really notable? They are both small numbers, and those NT machines are likely at companies with upgrade policies versus people who choose not to upgrade their personal macs for free.
- mariobertschler 10y agoI see this rather in favor for Mac OS X as their upgrade system definitely works, 10.8 is not old at all (2012), Windows NT is from the 90s mostly pre-internet. It's putting things into perspective.
- bostand 10y agoIt also shows what a solid OS Windows NT has been :) Also there are many valid reasons to not upgrade from NT...
- jmiserez 10y ago> Also there are many valid reasons to not upgrade from NT... Not if you expose your machine to the internet!
- hedora 10y agoI wonder about NT with nothing but up to date ssh exposed vs win 10 with nothing exposed except the pile of obscure phone home protocols you can't turn off. I suspect NT wins unless there are unpatched TCP/IP exploits. I wonder what percentage of in-use ATMs make a similar bet.
- dom0 10y ago
- russellbeattie 10y agoI thought it was weird that "other" had such a high percentage 4.98% - but then I clicked on the more broadly grouped chart (https://www.netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8&qpcustomd=0 https://www.netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share...) and it dropped to 0% - "other" meant other versions than those listed.
- shortformblog 10y agoThis is a much better chart than the one linked. The other chart, due to the way it breaks down versions, is a little misleading because of how it splits up market share of older OS versions (mostly with OSX, where only two versions are accounted for in the graph itself).
- ianai 10y agoIt really seemed like Linux and Mac were much higher up these days. A more interesting statistic would be "OS usage times" i.e. what are people looking at for the most hours. Probably nigh possible to get. Wait, advertisers probably know.
- cm2187 10y agoI think what you are after is "silicon valley / developpers usage time".
- tdb7893 10y agoI think the perception of Linux and Mac being used a ton is only in some developer circles. Unless the do a bunch of programming outside of work petty much all the developers I know use Windows at home.
- russellbeattie 10y agoAre Hacker News reader stats public? It'd be interesting to see how skewed the desktop OSs are...
- gravypod 10y agoI don't know. Many sectors require windows and I assume most HN readers are bored at work. You'll probably see a similar situation although my guess is Mac and Linux will be slightly higher on the totempoll. Probably more like 3-5% for Linux I'd say. Maybe even higher. I'd love to see the data like you say, would be interesting.
- greenhatman 10y agoThe Stack Overflow developer survey had both Mac and Linux at 20% in 2015. But Mac shot up to 26% in 2016. I think Hacker News will likely have very similar stats. Maybe somewhat more Mac and Linux leaning, even. http://stackoverflow.com/research/developer-survey-2016#technology-desktop-operating-system http://stackoverflow.com/research/developer-survey-2016#tech...
- MichaelApproved 10y agoPeople consume HN through 3rd parties, such as Twitter, RSS, and Reddit. Whatever the stats are with the website, they won't give you an accurate view of the actual HN reader.
- Freak_NL 10y agoWouldn't it be a representative sampling though? Unless users of certain OS'es are more inclined to use such third party clients than other users.
- rodgerd 10y agoITT: "I'd like to see numbers that confirm my bias."
- kriro 10y agoLinux has about half of the market share of all OS X versions combined. Not too bad considering there's not exactly many systems that come with Linux preinstalled. Still minuscule compared to the Windows market share but I'd gladly announce that the year of the Linux desktop has finally arrived if it gets to OS X level...which isn't all that far to go.
- quonn 10y agoNitpick: More like a third (0.36).
- kriro 10y agoYou are correct, I only scanned the other OS X versions from the bottom and kind of missed the 1.1% of 10.10.
- bostand 10y agoI think the actual Linux market share is higher. I know a lot of enterprises that have switched to Linux (for reason completely unrelated to the os itself).
- kobeya 10y agowhich should be reflected in these numbers, no?
- bostand 10y agoLook at their sampling methods. They use analytics from certain sites (news, social media, gov, ...) A lot of enterprises are beyond proxies and many places don't allow you to access internet outside a few select sites
- majewsky 10y agoA proxy won't mingle with the User-Agent header, or with the tracking JS that runs in the browser.
- shp0ngle 10y agoWell the year of the Linux desktop never came, it seems.
- hedora 10y agoIf you define "desktop" as 'not a portable computer', I suspect MacOS will drop a lot, percentage wise. Maybe Linux is already #2 in that market niche. Plenty of rack mounted linux machines run firefox/chrome...
- coldtea 10y agoAnd if you define desktop as "linux running computer" Linux totally dominates the category. But "year of the Linux desktop" has a clear and well defined meaning since 1999 or so -- it's about people running Linux (and Linux userland, not Android) on their personal computers, whether desktops or laptops.
- pjmlp 10y agoAlso Android has very few Linux exposed to application developers, Google could change it for something else and only OEMs would be pissed off. Only these APIs are allowed to be used. https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/libs.html https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/libs.html
- Pxtl 10y agoYeah, but the year of the Linux handheld has been here for quite some time. When do we get LibreOffice and Blender for AOSP?
- pjmlp 10y agoGood luck, this is the set of allowed native API on Android. https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/libs.html https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/libs.html As of Android 7, if the application tries to link to system libraries not part of that list, it will just get killed. https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2016/06/improving-stability-with-private-cc.html https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2016/06/improving-...
- st3fan 10y agoI am very happy to be in that 6% share that macOS has.
- sydd 10y agoI am happy to be in the majority camp.
- Walkman 10y agoOS X less than 5% ? That's really surprising!
- scholia 10y agoAccording to Wikipedia: "As of November 2013, Apple's online store was available in 39 countries, with physical Apple Stores numbering 444 in sixteen countries (263 US/181 elsewhere). The world has roughly 196 countries. I don't know how many of those you can buy Macs in, but I'd expect there are gaps. However, a lot poor countries have access to cheap PCs, or local cheap PC assemblers, or users can build their own machines.
- statictype 10y agoThere are countries where Apple cannot legally open a retail store. They go through tie ups and partnerships with local companies to setup stores and sell their products. For example, in India - every major city probably has at least 4-5 "Apple Stores" which are not fully owned by Apple and thus probably don't factor into these stats.
- herbst 10y agoThis. In thailand and cambodia apple seems widely available. None of those is a official store tho. I think i've seen more than those 400 stores in Thailand alone.
- kagamine 10y agoIn Norway too, there is a large chain official partner, essentially an Apple Store operated by not-Apple, but the online store is official Apple, I think that is what OP was referring to. IN some countries there is no Apple Store online.
- ebbv 10y agoWithout some information on how this data is calculated it's pretty tough too take it seriously. Not that I doubt Windows is the majority OS, it obviously is. But I didn't need a chart to know that. The chart may be inaccurate depending on the source of the data and how it was extrapolated.
- scholia 10y agoSee https://www.netmarketshare.com/faq.aspx#Methodology https://www.netmarketshare.com/faq.aspx#Methodology "The data is compiled from approximately 160 million unique visits per month. The information published on www.netmarketshare.com is an aggregation of the data from this network of hosted website traffic statistics. In addition, we classify 430+ referral sources identified as search engines. Aggregate traffic referrals from these engines are summarized and reported monthly. The statistics for search engines include both organic and sponsored referrals."
- fabrika 10y agoSomething must be very wrong with their methodology. I don't believe the total installed base is so volatile that the Mac share jumps from 7% to 9.57% then down to 6% within a single year. https://www.netmarketshare.com/report.aspx?qprid=9&qpaf=&qpcustom=Mac&qpcustomb=0&qpsp=203&qpnp=13&qptimeframe=M https://www.netmarketshare.com/report.aspx?qprid=9&qpaf=&qpc...
- Twisell 10y agoI'm actually very curious to find out how that will turn out in the long run because another source of the same kind definitively show quite a different trend for MacOS (and IMHO more continuous & realistic) : http://gs.statcounter.com/#os-ww-monthly-201512-201612 http://gs.statcounter.com/#os-ww-monthly-201512-201612
- blazespin 10y agohttps://www.netmarketshare.com/report.aspx?qprid=9&qpaf=&qpcustom=Mac&qpcustomb=0&qpsp=2014&qpnp=4&qptimeframe=Y https://www.netmarketshare.com/report.aspx?qprid=9&qpaf=&qpc... It's not that hard to believe. Their iPad + keyboard is cannibalizing their desktop. I'd love to see iOS + Mac versus Windows + Mobile Windows
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- scholia 10y ago> Something must be very wrong with their methodology. I don't believe the total installed base is so volatile that the Mac share jumps from 7% to 9.57% then down to 6% within a single year. Agreed. And it's by no means the first such example. However, the numbers are based on unique visitors to a range of websites. The variation might reflect a wide variation in web accesses from different operating systems (though I doubt it), but it doesn't directly measure the installed base.
- anonymfus 10y agoThey weight users from different countries by CIA's total numbers of internet users in these countries. (https://www.netmarketshare.com/faq.aspx#Country https://www.netmarketshare.com/faq.aspx#Country ) So some country having a big share of internet users according to CIA and small and volatile number of users counted by Netmarketshare can be the reason. China has about 22% of internet users according to CIA. Is there a way to estimate how many are counted by Netmarketshare?
- potatosoup 10y agoOS X Sierra (10.12) adoption chart https://www.gosquared.com/global/mac/sierra/#beta https://www.gosquared.com/global/mac/sierra/#beta Looks like people are split 30/30/30 between the last three versions with many holdouts. Things look way better in iOS land (76% on latest version): https://developer.apple.com/support/app-store/ https://developer.apple.com/support/app-store/
- jcoffland 10y agoHere are some other OS usage stats. http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_os.asp http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_os.asp http://cdn1b.static.pornhub.phncdn.com/insights-static//wp-content/uploads/2016/12/4-pornhub-insights-2016-year-review-operating-system.png http://cdn1b.static.pornhub.phncdn.com/insights-static//wp-c...
- galago 10y agoI would like to see the PornHub numbers for desktop and mobile combined. That would give a better sense of what's going on. My guess for the consumer market is that it looks like Windows is in solid shape, but the reality is that people are spending more time on mobile devices, even if they have a PC somewhere in the house.
- bostand 10y agoBecause pornhub stats are skewed towards services that ..ummm ... allow one handed use? Wouldn't that affect iPhone 7 vs 7+ numbers?
- galago 10y agoMy comment wasn't specific to pornography. I think its generally understood that home browsing is moving off desktops.
- michaelmrose 10y agoDo you mean more people are getting laptops or that people are moving off laptops/desktops to mobile devices?
- yetanotherme 10y agohttps://www.netmarketshare.com/report.aspx?qprid=11&qpaf=&qpcustom=FreeBSD&qpcustomb=0 https://www.netmarketshare.com/report.aspx?qprid=11&qpaf=&qp... They need more decimal points to explain it
- phkamp 10y ago"desktop" is a totally useless and nonsensical classification, when they do not (which is obvious from their numbers) count laptops plugged into a screen & keyboard for the duration of a workday as a "desktop".
- coldtea 10y agoNonsensical? Laptops/desktop are a form factor / product category, not a usage pattern. The same way as 20kg desktop PC on boats are not "laptops". Sometimes you do need to know how its used (e.g. if you sell peripherals that only make sense for "road warriors" you will want to know how many use their machines at a specific location all day, regardless of form factor), but most of the time, laptop/desktop distinction based on form, like the one we always been using, makes far more sense.
- sureshn 10y agoWith 88.67% of desktop OS being different flavors of microsoft OS, it seems a bit overwhelming that its still that high , especially after a massive acceptance of ubuntu. Its shocking that Apple has failed to make inroads in any other country outside the USA. One wonders why it never crossed their minds. This gives Microsoft a great opportunity to win back this big iPhone using crowd by making their Apps platform independent which they are doing already. I see Microsoft coming back big time like the windows 98 , 2000 and VB 6.0 kind of good times awaits them now :)
- goodcanadian 10y agoTwo thoughts come to mind: 1) If Microsoft is already/still at ~90%, is there really room for a big time come back? Getting the rest of the market is small potatoes compared to what they already have. 2) How much of the market does desktop represent, anyway? Most people I know do not own a desktop. They may have a laptop, but they may also only have a tablet and/or phone. Now, I believe you are actually suggesting that Microsoft can leverage their desktop market to get back into tablets and phones, but I don't know . . . so far, their efforts have been disappointing, and frankly, people are used to their Android devices, so Microsoft will actually be the weird phone even if it is the normal desktop.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- michaelmrose 10y agoDesktop is synonymous with laptop/desktop machine in fact it is actually difficult to separate the two. I think this is the case here.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- pjmlp 10y agoHere in Germany most consumer store chains have replaced hybrid Android tablets and netbooks with Windows 10 versions. Many of those devices do allow for a SIM card as well.
- ChuckMcM 10y agoYou have to love the big spike in Windows 98 usage in Feb '16 (https://www.netmarketshare.com/report.aspx?qprid=11&qpaf=&qpcustom=Windows+98&qpcustomb=0 https://www.netmarketshare.com/report.aspx?qprid=11&qpaf=&qp...)
- PetahNZ 10y agoThat big jump from 0.01% to 0.01%
- gmuslera 10y agoLast months saw an example of a distributed database/api service scraping, using hundreds of thousands of IPs of around the world, and random user agents (I think that all started with Mozilla/5.0, but the rest were from random historical user agents), to avoid rate limits. The OSs referenced in those user agents went back to early windows versions, OS/2 Warp and Maemo (to put 2 examples that hurt knowing that were fake). If this site take as base sites/URLs that are somewhat hit by that kind of traffic the stats could be very misleading.
- herbst 10y agoYeah. Where is "vitaly rules" in this graph? I have medium sizes sites where that is 2-7% of the traffic right now.
- sogen 10y agoThis is a duplicate from a couple days ago
- yabatopia 10y agoAre there somewhere market share statistics available for desktop and mobile operating systems combined? The separation between desktop and mobile devices feels a bit outdated. How does Windows relate to Android or iOS, for example?
- fergie 10y agoCan OSX plus Linux combined really be below 7%? If so, I live in a freaky bubble.
- erelde 10y agoWindows must have at least half of its share from corporate clients. It's about the only desktop OS used in a corporate environment.
- MagnumOpus 10y agoIf you are browsing HN, you likely live and work in a bubble with massive over-representation of the very rich (who buy Macs disproportionately) and the IT tinkerers (who use Linux disproportionately). (This is the case even for the US, but even more so worldwide, where a Macbook costs a month's gross salary rather than a week's worth.)
- konficker 10y agoHate to be pedantic but Linux is not an operating system.