> It's definitely selection bias. As I stated in another thread, the "all drug users are lazy" mythos is also a form of selection bias. The only difference is

> It's definitely selection bias. As I stated in another thread, the "all drug users are lazy" mythos is also a form of selection bias. The only difference is that my selection bias isn't being used as a justification for jailing people. I think that's an important difference. > Rural areas, working class areas, ghettos - another story - and I think they represent the 'majority' of users by far. We see similar harms from excessive tobacco and alcohol abuse in those communities, but we don't outlaw those drugs. So, why do we draw the arbitrary line where we do? And how, exactly, does jailing these people actually help anything? Basically, I don't take this argument seriously unless the person advocating it is in favor of marijuana legalization or else supports alcohol prohibition.