I pretty clearly said it was controversial, so I'm not sure what you're trying to say. That said, moral relativism has a very low status in philosophy. Many ph

I pretty clearly said it was controversial, so I'm not sure what you're trying to say. That said, moral relativism has a very low status in philosophy. Many philosophers think it is simply incoherent (the fifth paragraph here dances around one reason: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-relativism/#MetMorRel https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-relativism/#MetMorR...). It is much more common for philosophers to hold that there simply are no moral facts, or that moral statements are merely expressions of approval or disapproval, or some similar position (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-cognitivism/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-cognitivism/).