3 ms·
> Persistent progress indicators are known to cause performance degradation unless implemented carefully. Are you referring to that npm progress bar thing a fe
by jff 10y ago
> Persistent progress indicators are known to cause performance degradation unless implemented carefully.
Are you referring to that npm progress bar thing a few months back? I'm pretty sure the reason for that can be summed up as "javascript, and web developers".
Anyway, he's not proposing progress bars by default, he's proposing a method by which you can query a process to see how far it's come. I think there's even a key combination to do this on FreeBSD.
Or, for example, you could write a small program that sends a USR1 signal every 5 seconds, splitting out the responsibility of managing a progress bar:
% progress cp bigfile /tmp/
And then the 'progress' program would draw you a text progress bar, or even pop up an X window with a progress bar.
- erikbye 10y agoYes, C-t for SIGINFO, works on all BSDs (including macOS).
- hashhar 10y agoCheck this out. https://github.com/Xfennec/progress https://github.com/Xfennec/progress
- jff 10y agoThat's great! I think due to the way it's implemented it wouldn't be able to do progress reporting for e.g. "dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=1M count=2048", but that's a less common case than just cp'ing a big "regular" file.