3 ms·
>against his knowledge He is a child, they are his parents. They have every right to choose his treatment >quackery If medical science had an alternative you
by jimnotgym 10y ago
>against his knowledge
He is a child, they are his parents. They have every right to choose his treatment
>quackery
If medical science had an alternative you may have a point. These parents ran out of options
- DanBC 10y agoNo, parents don't have the right to do what they like to their children. > If medical science had an alternative you may have a point. These parents ran out of options Exactly the point I made above. Lack of options does not mean parents can just try anything else. Some parents with no options chose bleach to treat autism. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/autism-potentially-lethal-bleach-cure-feared-to-have-spread-to-britain-a6744291.html http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/... This mother has no idea what harm might come to the child as a result of her experimental treatment. If she's doing it to herself that's one thing, but she's inflicting it on a child.
- jimnotgym 10y agoThat is not what I said, I said choose treatment not experiment. The mother states that she consulted with various medical professionals in the article. Once you have consulted you have the right to choose treatment. The article says She consulted with people specifically about the risks involved and was advised they were extremely low. How is that equivalent in any way to experimenting on children????