3 ms·
With regard to your first part of your first contention, that Russia hacked the DNC, read the Crowdstrike report[1]. That will contain the most technical indica
by ENOTTY 10y ago
With regard to your first part of your first contention, that Russia hacked the DNC, read the Crowdstrike report[1]. That will contain the most technical indicators publicly revealed.
The second part, that Russia hacked John Podesta, is summarized mostly in these analyses.[2][3] Basically some actor used a single bitly account to create nearly 10,000 bitly links to sites that were obvious phishing domains for Google logins. Many of these links targeted people who only Russia would be interested in, for example, investigators of the MH17 shootdown, journalists and academics with a Russia focus, and organizations in the former Soviet states and Europe. Some of these domains were also linked to other campaigns known to be linked to APT28 or 29 (i.e., Russia).
Your second contention, that Russia provided exfiltrated data to Wikileaks, seems to rely mostly on classified intelligence. All the public evidence is circumstantial. Up to you to believe it or not.
[1]: https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/ https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democ...
[2]: https://www.secureworks.com/research/threat-group-4127-targets-google-accounts https://www.secureworks.com/research/threat-group-4127-targe...
[3]: https://www.threatconnect.com/blog/russia-hacks-bellingcat-mh17-investigation/ https://www.threatconnect.com/blog/russia-hacks-bellingcat-m...