JSCL is quite different from ClojureScript. ClojureScript has a self-hosted form (which, AFAICT, is the default for JSCL), but that's not what you want for most

JSCL is quite different from ClojureScript. ClojureScript has a self-hosted form (which, AFAICT, is the default for JSCL), but that's not what you want for most applications if you want to produce efficient minified code. My two specific claims about ClojureScript being good included source maps and aggressive optimizations (and all of the cool side effects from having Closure as your module system) -- neither applies to Parenscript (as I mentioned) or JSCL.