3 ms·
I'm going to second that "intvlMS" is terrible. I didn't confuse it with "intval", but it's like making people play Wheel of Fortune with your variable names. I
by Noumenon72 10y ago
I'm going to second that "intvlMS" is terrible. I didn't confuse it with "intval", but it's like making people play Wheel of Fortune with your variable names. It takes so long to read. Even if you called it "intervalMS", that is not how you pluralize things (which would be "Ms") or how you abbreviate meters ("m"). It could be "intervalMicroSeconds". Just call it "intervalMeters" and save everyone from parsing your "concise" hand-minified code.
- manyxcxi 10y agoThat was probably a bad off the cuff example, my point was that there's a happy medium between concise and verbose, and I think we're better off erring on the side of verbose.