4 ms·
I think the difference between plants/animals and humans might be tied to mortality rates. I would imagine that urbanization has a very adverse effect on most p
by skadamou 10y ago
I think the difference between plants/animals and humans might be tied to mortality rates. I would imagine that urbanization has a very adverse effect on most plant and animal species and that only a small minority of individuals survive the initial shock of urbanization. Those that do survive will pass on the traits that allowed them to flourish in their new environment and such traits will quickly dominate the post-urbanization populations of these plants and animals since they are necessary for their survival. Humans are different in that urbanization appears to make survival (and mating?) easier for a majority of the population and thus there are not such strong selective effects.
Note: I am not a genetic biologist, this is just conjecture
- rdiddly 10y agoYou've got the right idea. Think of any urban center as the site of a localized mass extinction, and you're even closer. Evolution doesn't always happen slowly. In a mass extinction event it happens quickly.
- Almaviva 10y agoNow consider that in human history, about 40% of men were able to breed. So 30% of the population goes extinct every generation without passing on genes, assuming all women reproduce. So with a few hundred iterations of this kind of 70:30 split, you could see how evolution could happen quite quickly even under normal circumstances.