3 ms·
I was thinking about that but I don't know what to do with the type of the param you're accepting. Could you do a const void* ref? Might just be easier to make
by inlined 10y ago
I was thinking about that but I don't know what to do with the type of the param you're accepting. Could you do a const void* ref? Might just be easier to make it variadic.
- AlexeyBrin 10y agoSee this comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13346432 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13346432 . At this point creating a function like: array_push_back(int nr_arguments, ...); that will replace the original macro ~~should be possible~~. Actually it won't work without using non-standard compiler extensions like typeof.