3 ms·
> Juggling fire is audacious. Is it? The article points out that juggling fire is no more dangerous than juggling pins. It only appears audacious to an ignoran
by sbov 10y ago
> Juggling fire is audacious.
Is it? The article points out that juggling fire is no more dangerous than juggling pins. It only appears audacious to an ignorant audience.
- Godel_unicode 10y agoThat's kind of the point though. The reality of the difficulty is unimportant, it's the perception of difficulty that matters.
- sbov 10y agoThen it's a dangerous parallel when talking about startups. Easy but impressive has no moat. Probably worse than easy but boring.
- Godel_unicode 10y agoOr it's impressive because the marketing and design is really good? Think Beats headphones; nothing special technically, horrible value proposition, yet you see them everywhere. Is that not a most?
- sbov 10y agoIf by "marketing" you mean "celebrity endorsement". Beats was founded by Dr. Dre and featured by several hip hop artists and in several music videos. Which is not said to denigrate Beats. By all means, play to your strengths. But it's certainly not an avenue obtainable by your average startup. Beyond that, if you're talking a startup - especially an early startup - you probably aren't at the "I'm everywhere" stage yet. We mostly self fund our companies. Easy and impressive, for us, tends to be a death knell. 6, maybe 12 months before someone bigger with more money comes into the market. Boring and easy is OK though, because people don't really pay much attention to boring.
- fourthark 10y agoShowmanship and perceived difficulty often seem to matter more than actual skill in writing code, too.