3 ms·
Oh is this 242-FZ? If so, that ate up like most of my Q3 2015. My cynical reading of the law was that it was aimed more at having data physically on hand if i
by dmoy 10y ago
Oh is this 242-FZ? If so, that ate up like most of my Q3 2015.
My cynical reading of the law was that it was aimed more at having data physically on hand if it needs to be subpoenaed. But IANAL, so maybe I'm just being too cynical. Also what I did or didn't think of the law doesn't matter really, since higher ups decided what was to be done about the law, and I just implemented it.
- dntlkatmyname 10y agoI think that law was just blatant incompetence. For one there is no process for verifying whether or not you actually store anything in Russia. And even then, there's not much of a point in having a physical access to that data unless somebody is stupid enough to store it in plain text.