3 ms·
>They used that power to publish biased articles, half truths, etc. No they didn't. They just didn't post what people wanted. >started distrusting the mass me
by justinlaster 10y ago
>They used that power to publish biased articles, half truths, etc.
No they didn't. They just didn't post what people wanted.
>started distrusting the mass media.
People were told to distrust the media, and they followed through because it tickles people's ego's.
- pessimizer 10y agoThe Post wasn't great before Bezos, now they're building 5000 word editorials from single tweets, putting them in the news section, and giving them headlines that would shame Buzzfeed.
- fdsaaf 10y ago> >They used that power to publish biased articles, half truths, etc. > No they didn't. They just didn't post what people wanted. What about the Rolling Stone Jackie scandal? What about the constant demonization of men?
- justinlaster 10y agoAre you seriously going to try to treat a blip from one publisher and act like it's characteristic of the whole ecosystem? For your information, other publishers that are apart of the "MSM" called out the Rolling Stone article.