4 ms·

I like Firefox, but on my Mac I use Safari because every other browser sucks down battery at ridiculous levels in comparison. I don't need anything fancy, and I

I like Firefox, but on my Mac I use Safari because every other browser sucks down battery at ridiculous levels in comparison. I don't need anything fancy, and I don't use any extensions (I do my ad blocking at my DNS server). So Safari is generally good enough. The only thing I dislike about it is, when the developer tools are open, everything on the screen flashes red when you click or mouse over it. That's my only complaint.

koevet 10y ago
Hi! Can you elaborate on the ad-blocking at DNS server thing? Thanks!
- djsumdog 10y ago
  They most likely use the /etc/hosts file or run a local DNS server that redirects all ad server URLs to 127.0.0.1. If you block ads this way and run a little web server locally, you can also log all the ad requests and see some of the information they're passing around. Some people also display little random images from that web server so they can see where the ads would have been on the page they're browsing. If you don't mind ads being served by the site owners, you'll also be able to see these ads. If ads running on the same server this bothers you, you usually can't block them via DNS and so this is a limitation over something like uBlock Origin which can have rules for dom IDs on a page.
- Fnoord 10y ago
  Pi-Hole [1], for example. Using a proxy in your system settings together with e.g. Privoxy (which runs locally or remotely on e.g. a RPi) also works (but that is proxy-based filtering). Both DNS-based and proxy-based filtering can be circumvented. I just use uBlock everywhere, and have been playing around with AdNauseam. These work well enough. The only time those fail miserably is when a browser is being embedded in an application, like on Android and iOS apps. I tend to buy the premium version anyway if I really like an app (no subscriptions though!). There are 2 ways to circumvent those apps with ads. 1) use web browser (w/uBlock) instead or 2) use a DNS-based filtering (such as a Pi-Hole). However the latter option requires network access to the DNS server of the Pi-Hole which isn't there when you're roaming (e.g. on 3G/4G or a foreign Wi-Fi network). A workaround to that is using a VPN to your RPi. For me, that is too much work (had a similar setup in past), and the upload speed on my home network isn't to write home about (YMMV). Btw, not sure if all of this can be worked with DNSCrypt since when you're roaming there's the vulnerability of DNS hijacking. [1] https://pi-hole.net https://pi-hole.net
  - freehunter 10y ago
    Yep, I run Pi-Hole. I ran uBlock before, but a lot of sites would stop working when they detected it, and it didn't work on devices that didn't have browser extensions. I'm pretty happy with this setup.
nunez 10y ago
Chrome is much better about power consumption since v50 or so
swaroop 10y ago
You can also use http://kablock.com http://kablock.com Safari extension, works well.
- freehunter 10y ago
  I used to run an ad blocker as a Safari extension, but many sites these days don't let you visit if you're running an ad blocker. They can't detect if you're running a Pi-Hole though.

koevet 10y ago

Hi! Can you elaborate on the ad-blocking at DNS server thing? Thanks!

djsumdog 10y ago
They most likely use the /etc/hosts file or run a local DNS server that redirects all ad server URLs to 127.0.0.1. If you block ads this way and run a little web server locally, you can also log all the ad requests and see some of the information they're passing around. Some people also display little random images from that web server so they can see where the ads would have been on the page they're browsing. If you don't mind ads being served by the site owners, you'll also be able to see these ads. If ads running on the same server this bothers you, you usually can't block them via DNS and so this is a limitation over something like uBlock Origin which can have rules for dom IDs on a page.
Fnoord 10y ago
Pi-Hole [1], for example. Using a proxy in your system settings together with e.g. Privoxy (which runs locally or remotely on e.g. a RPi) also works (but that is proxy-based filtering). Both DNS-based and proxy-based filtering can be circumvented. I just use uBlock everywhere, and have been playing around with AdNauseam. These work well enough. The only time those fail miserably is when a browser is being embedded in an application, like on Android and iOS apps. I tend to buy the premium version anyway if I really like an app (no subscriptions though!). There are 2 ways to circumvent those apps with ads. 1) use web browser (w/uBlock) instead or 2) use a DNS-based filtering (such as a Pi-Hole). However the latter option requires network access to the DNS server of the Pi-Hole which isn't there when you're roaming (e.g. on 3G/4G or a foreign Wi-Fi network). A workaround to that is using a VPN to your RPi. For me, that is too much work (had a similar setup in past), and the upload speed on my home network isn't to write home about (YMMV). Btw, not sure if all of this can be worked with DNSCrypt since when you're roaming there's the vulnerability of DNS hijacking. [1] https://pi-hole.net https://pi-hole.net
- freehunter 10y ago
  Yep, I run Pi-Hole. I ran uBlock before, but a lot of sites would stop working when they detected it, and it didn't work on devices that didn't have browser extensions. I'm pretty happy with this setup.

nunez 10y ago

Chrome is much better about power consumption since v50 or so

swaroop 10y ago

You can also use http://kablock.com http://kablock.com Safari extension, works well.

freehunter 10y ago
I used to run an ad blocker as a Safari extension, but many sites these days don't let you visit if you're running an ad blocker. They can't detect if you're running a Pi-Hole though.