3 ms·
Fun read. I must admit, I would have never predicted the ending. Amazing if it turns out to be true.
by donretag 10y ago
Fun read. I must admit, I would have never predicted the ending. Amazing if it turns out to be true.
- Lordarminius 10y agoYeah it reads like a Leclair novel. The spy was probably burned from the beginning; an informant could have warned the Britsh(?) of his coming deployment and they in turn set the 'mother' on him.
- blinddev 10y agoThe fact that the real Erwin van Haarlem seemingly vanished is suspicious. I would assume you would only want to assign an identity of someone who is known to be dead, yet the orphanage apparently sent many letters to the mother. Assuming that's true, of course.
- Lordarminius 10y agoI assume he may have died later in life, maybe late childhood
- pvitz 10y agoSpoiler: The real one was adopted and met Johanna later. Source: The story can be found on Kindle Singles, but the BBC article contains basically everything interesting already.
- sulam 10y agoSo why weren't there two of them? Or were there and it never became an issue?
- pvitz 10y agoThe real one got adopted when he was four years old and his new parents "raised him as their own." He found out about the adoption a long time later. Therefore, it is safe to assume that he also had a different name.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]