>Because it is a moral question: Should you be able to control all data about you, and how it moves? That's not the argument Stallman actually makes here thoug

>Because it is a moral question: Should you be able to control all data about you, and how it moves? That's not the argument Stallman actually makes here though. Note that he doesn't list 'propriety software running on Google's servers' as a reason not to use Google, even though that has far more of an an impact on your ability to control information about you (or to modify the software that you are using) then the comparatively small amount of client side javascript that runs when you use Google. The general FSF/Stallman position is that non-free software is fine as long as you access it over a network. So clearly control over your own data isn't why RMS is morally opposed to non-free software.