3 ms·
>Of course I'm not arguing against feeding the needy, or against social nets in general. Of course you do. You just concat a nice relativizing clause to the en
by Pica_soO 10y ago
>Of course I'm not arguing against feeding the needy, or against social nets in general.
Of course you do. You just concat a nice relativizing clause to the end, to not feel like a monster.
Sorry, but in a world where people are starving, because the likes of you want to shirk responsibilities, noone could ever be not on guard. What a nightmare.
To constantly have to live with your back to the wall. And the irony, is that after you paid for the gated community guard, for the area to be exclusive, for the medicine and for the weapons- you paid more then European taxes for a "welfare" state - and got less.
- adwn 10y ago> Of course you do [argue against feeding the needy, or against social nets in general]. No, I really don't. > And the irony, is that after you paid for the gated community guard, for the area to be exclusive, for the medicine and for the weapons- you paid more then European taxes for a "welfare" state - and got less. You're incorrectly assuming that I'm not European. I'm also not living in a gated community, and there is no one guarding me personally. > [...] to not feel like a monster [...] the likes of you want to shirk responsibilities [...] What a nightmare [...] You're seriously overreacting, and you're making extreme, unfounded assumptions about my opinions and motivations. That's not the way to have a factual debate. I won't continue this discussion under these conditions.