3 ms·

Arch (Or any rolling release) isn't just about cutting edge. OS upgrades tend to break stuff depending on your usage (something compiled against the specific ke

Arch (Or any rolling release) isn't just about cutting edge. OS upgrades tend to break stuff depending on your usage (something compiled against the specific kernel version). Updating your computer every few days means you can avoid it entirely.

luka-birsa 10y ago
Arch is a joke an should be considered only if you LIKE tinkering with your OS all the time. The preposition of always up to date would be great if that wouldn't mean that your PC doesn't work properly most of the time due to some new bug or incompatibility. We've run Arch on embedded PCs (arm) due to out of the box docker support, but after updating a year later we've literally were unable to deploy Docker containers. There was a bug in the kernel, and no amount of hacking, upgrading or downgrading made it work. Luckily we had a sdcard snapshot a year old. I suggest Ubuntu or Debian, they got good docs, good support and generally a positive community. As far as windows managers go - pick what you like. Gnome looks slick, xbuntu is my go-to for Chromebooks and default isn't too bad. A lot of devs in our company go for tiling desktop managers - i3, awm....
- deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]
- demonshreder 10y ago
  For others:That would be Arch Linux ARM[0] a derivative of Arch Linux(it runs only on x86-64). I am surprised to find that it doesn't have a linux-lts package. What made you use Arch in the first place? [0] https://archlinuxarm.org/ https://archlinuxarm.org/
- AsyncAwait 10y ago
  The Arch Linux ARM distro is not related to Arch. > The preposition of always up to date would be great if that wouldn't mean that your PC doesn't work properly most of the time due to some new bug or incompatibility. I haven't found this to be the case at all, quite the opposite, I've run stable Arch systems for years, even done large upgrades like the switch to systemd without an issue.
- m45t3r 10y ago
  > We've run Arch on embedded PCs (arm) due to out of the box docker support, but after updating a year later we've literally were unable to deploy Docker containers. There was a bug in the kernel, and no amount of hacking, upgrading or downgrading made it work. You are talking about a non official Arch project (Arch Linux ARM) as it was an official derivative of Arch. It is not.

luka-birsa 10y ago

Arch is a joke an should be considered only if you LIKE tinkering with your OS all the time. The preposition of always up to date would be great if that wouldn't mean that your PC doesn't work properly most of the time due to some new bug or incompatibility. We've run Arch on embedded PCs (arm) due to out of the box docker support, but after updating a year later we've literally were unable to deploy Docker containers. There was a bug in the kernel, and no amount of hacking, upgrading or downgrading made it work. Luckily we had a sdcard snapshot a year old. I suggest Ubuntu or Debian, they got good docs, good support and generally a positive community. As far as windows managers go - pick what you like. Gnome looks slick, xbuntu is my go-to for Chromebooks and default isn't too bad. A lot of devs in our company go for tiling desktop managers - i3, awm....

deleted 10y ago
[deleted]
demonshreder 10y ago
For others:That would be Arch Linux ARM[0] a derivative of Arch Linux(it runs only on x86-64). I am surprised to find that it doesn't have a linux-lts package. What made you use Arch in the first place? [0] https://archlinuxarm.org/ https://archlinuxarm.org/
AsyncAwait 10y ago
The Arch Linux ARM distro is not related to Arch. > The preposition of always up to date would be great if that wouldn't mean that your PC doesn't work properly most of the time due to some new bug or incompatibility. I haven't found this to be the case at all, quite the opposite, I've run stable Arch systems for years, even done large upgrades like the switch to systemd without an issue.
m45t3r 10y ago
> We've run Arch on embedded PCs (arm) due to out of the box docker support, but after updating a year later we've literally were unable to deploy Docker containers. There was a bug in the kernel, and no amount of hacking, upgrading or downgrading made it work. You are talking about a non official Arch project (Arch Linux ARM) as it was an official derivative of Arch. It is not.