4 ms·
The difference is that, as media has fragmented and people find increasingly diverse sources of news and entertainment, there are more niche celebrities and few
by monodeldiablo 10y ago
The difference is that, as media has fragmented and people find increasingly diverse sources of news and entertainment, there are more niche celebrities and fewer mega celebrities.
Manufacturing a mega celebrity takes a certain degree of monopolization of attention. But the days of three-network-television and two-station radio markets are gone. We don't, as a society, watch and listen to the same stuff anymore. It started with cable in the 90s, but it's accelerated with the internet.
I don't know who Anna Kendrick is, but if she's anything like the rest of the "celebrities" I'm supposed to know, she's a Q-list reality show extra with a hyperactive agent. The internet has globalized and democratized the market for attention, which means greater competition, more niches, shorter shelf lives, and fewer monopolies.
- segf4ult 10y agoWhile I agree that Anna Kendrick might not need a biography at 31, she definitely isn't Q list. Probably A list, maybe B if we're being picky.
- moomin 10y agoActually, she's quite different from that. For one thing, she can actually sing, and a fair few of her roles involve it. My 5yo regards her as the definitive Cinderella, for instance. Edit: Oh yes, and was the star of a movie that took $290m worldwide, from a budget of $29m.