4 ms·
No, the entitled perspective here is that simply having money entitles you to the bulk of reward, and that a group of people who will not have negative conseque
by st3v3r 10y ago
No, the entitled perspective here is that simply having money entitles you to the bulk of reward, and that a group of people who will not have negative consequences for a company going under is taking more risk than people who would be losing their income stream, and possibly their health coverage and home.
- Frondo 10y agoAnd damage to their careers, and of course the simple time lost on fraudulent ventures. Imagine the young, newly-minted PhD looking to strike out in industry and kick-start their career with some real cool engineering. They saddle up with Theranos and sink several years of productive life into a technology that will never work--and that people at the top knew would never work. They'll move on, but at what cost? This is their life and career, not just a bit of cash. Compare that to a VC losing their investment? That is insulting and wrong on every mark.