3 ms·

Thanks! It's still a stretch to say that "Clinton paid trolls" since PACs (hybrid-PACs?) offer a layer of indirection.

• jwtadvice2 10y ago
  But we would want to say the same thing about Russian intelligence and US intelligence and their 'paid trolls'. They do it through layers of obscurity exactly for deniability. We need to hold them all to the same standard. I don't know what that standard is, mind you.
• colordrops 10y ago
  How is it a stretch? They were clearly and obviously working for Clinton.
  • totally 10y ago
    "working for" as in aligning their cause, but not necessarily "working for" as in being paid by. There's no indication that Clinton gave them money, is there?
    • colordrops 10y ago
      You can't be serious.