4 ms·

> Apple had Siri out and was in the lead with voice control, then they wasted it. I think this statement can be generalized to almost every single product Appl

> Apple had Siri out and was in the lead with voice control, then they wasted it. I think this statement can be generalized to almost every single product Apple sells or has sold. They've seriously excelled at innovation in the past (tons of great historic computers, the iPod, the iPhone, the iPad, Siri, etc.) but then it's like the whole company eventually gets bored with Product X and moves on because "Innovation is Out There!"

Touche 10y ago
I honestly want to know what was innovative about Siri. Android already have voice commands at that time, they just didn't have a cutesy name for it. I guess Siri was "innovative" in that it had a clever marketing campaign behind it, that Google, Microsoft, and Amazon later copied.
- nashashmi 10y ago
  Siri was a big distraction when it came in the box with humor. But otherwise, it was the future. Just think if you were supposed to control your device with voice only. Blind people could use it. Car drivers could use it. Lazy people could use it. Siri took a long time to integrate into apps. Siri took a while to get some intelligence. Siri took a while to integrate more into the OS. Siri became just another app but with a hardware shortcut. Nothing more. Future spoiled.
  - Touche 10y ago
    But Siri wasn't voice activated at the start. It actually got that feature after Google Now had it. So again, I don't see anything that was innovative about Siri at its release.
- sosborn 10y ago
  > Android already have voice commands at that time, they just didn't have a cutesy name for it. So did iOS, well before Android. They just didn't have a cutesy name for it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voice_command_device#Voice_command_mobile_devices https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voice_command_device#Voice_com...