4 ms·
I don't know the details, but I can't see a reason why they can't just not include the SDK until they need it (sure, this will add a delay before they can use i
by d2p 10y ago
I don't know the details, but I can't see a reason why they can't just not include the SDK until they need it (sure, this will add a delay before they can use it, but seems better than this current implementation for privacy!).
- chatmasta 10y agoIt's obviously in facebook's interest to load the SDK as much as possible. Even if you are not logged in, they can get a lot of valuable tracking information from the server logs, including IP address, referrer, any fb cookies other than login, etc. In fact, so long as a client loads the sdk on multiple sites, even if logged out, Facebook can still track that client across sites visited (simple list of referrers associated withvthis cookieset)