4 ms·
Well, we can measure efficacy here by seeing how far average speeds differ from the target speed over time. If they match closely, then I think it's reasonable
by aninhumer 10y ago
Well, we can measure efficacy here by seeing how far average speeds differ from the target speed over time. If they match closely, then I think it's reasonable to say it is "good enough".
- denzil_correa 10y agoThis is not ONLY about speed. There are two variables here - speed and price. You've got to tell me the point at which you get the best speed at the best price.
- aninhumer 10y ago>You've got to tell me the point at which you get the best speed at the best price. What does that even mean? People value speed differently, and so are being charged differently. If people value speed highly enough, they can pay for the express lane, and if they don't they can take a presumably slower non-express lane. Making this distinction allows everyone to get closer to their own individual "best speed at the best price".
- denzil_correa 10y agoIt means that $30 may or may not be the optimal price. People may value the same facility at $1 or $100. The onus is on the entity who justifies the price to prove that $30 is indeed the best price point. At this moment, I've seen no justification for the $30 price point.
- aninhumer 10y agoOptimal in what sense?