I think the rise of freelancers and devoted hobbyists is competing away value adds for mass market journalism. I think there's some truth to this. I think ther

I think the rise of freelancers and devoted hobbyists is competing away value adds for mass market journalism. I think there's some truth to this. I think there's also a need for accreditation or other validation/reputation services, not to serve as a gatekeeper, but to assist in helping people determine which sources are likely worthwhile to listen to. If the vetting needs to be done for each person on a per-author basis, that can be overwhelming, not dissimilar to the paradox of choice. In some ways this may end up looking similar to existing publishers, though with a little less tight-coupling between author and publisher. It's pretty clear there are large changes underway.