2 ms·
Not that I know of, but the point is that our system ought to be robust against historical and statistical flukes. If you're going to decide elections via firs
by eli_gottlieb 10y ago
Not that I know of, but the point is that our system ought to be robust against historical and statistical flukes. If you're going to decide elections via first-past-the-post at all, you should at least make the election pass a 95% likelihood hypothesis test for difference-of-means or something.
- wcarron 10y agoI''m of the same sentiment, but I feel that even more rigor and a smaller p value should be demanded from our election methods. 99% seems like a nice number.