Two things: 1. What's the proper way to do a NULL check? In the first example, they show how a NULL check could be optimized away, but I didn't see where they

Two things: 1. What's the proper way to do a NULL check? In the first example, they show how a NULL check could be optimized away, but I didn't see where they explained how to do it the right way. I might have just missed it though. 2. It would be nice if compilers offered a special optimization flag that performs most optimizations, but also “fills in the gaps” for non standard behavior by behaving how people expect. I realize that this would essentially be like each compiler implementing its own version of the standard in a way, but the reality is that if 99% of the people are making an assumption about how the compiler is going to do something, maybe that’s how the compiler should do it? Perhaps like a “speed+security” optimization flag. GCC already has some flags to handle certain questionable things such as strict aliasing, etc… Maybe something already exists, IDK. I guess the real solution would be to change the actual standard. EDIT: A comment elsewhere provides a good response to my second point. It was along the lines of "which optimizations are okay then? Most optimizations broke code at some point". I guess my response would be to only disable the ones that are the most common trouble makers. Another factor could be the performance gain vs amount of bugs it causes. I am reconsidering my second point though...