> Rice supports warrentless surveillance. Warrants are only required in some cases of surveillance. Those who are not U.S. persons do not have a constitutiona

> Rice supports warrentless surveillance. Warrants are only required in some cases of surveillance. Those who are not U.S. persons do not have a constitutional right to a warrant before being surveilled. Public information does not require a warrant (e.g. the government does not require a warrant to open a phone book). Third parties may volunteer information without a warrant. Items crossing a national border — including communications crossing a national border — do not require a warrant. There are plenty of constitutional, legal warrantless searches. You may not like some or all of those; I may not like some of those. But neither you nor I are the dictator of the Constitution or the law.