3 ms·
How dangerous is it, really? Most only communities have some form of moderation. And besides, I think that there really must be options for shaping the feed tha
by acjohnson55 10y ago
How dangerous is it, really? Most only communities have some form of moderation. And besides, I think that there really must be options for shaping the feed that reduce the ability for abuse to be magnified. See https://twitter.com/StateFarm/status/811603055762436096 https://twitter.com/StateFarm/status/811603055762436096 for an example of not doing that.
- vonklaus 10y agoSuper dangerous! Sure twitter is a big private company it has the right to moderate content-- but should it. Reddit also moderates content. The NYC moderates content, sure the founding family "controls" editorial responsibility but does Carlos Slim mexican telecom magnate excert his >14% financial interest to "shape the feed". America is a community, yes we need "some form of moderation", but we enter into a very slippery slope when anybody but the community chooses what "moderation" means. Reddit is a decent example-- albeit still flawed; of how this can work. It is states right, sharding, seperation of concerns, or a subreddit type model where small microcosms choose what is acceptable. I dont agree with the KKK and hate speech is terrible, but if it is limited to speech I am all for it. I, like I assume many, will use my power to ostracize and dissiauade people from being hate mongering racists-- but it is helpful when I can identify who they are when they self-select to dress up like ghosts 365 days a year instead of just the end of october like many other Americans do. Edit: to be clear, I am all for free speech & freedom to organize-- not all for the kkk obviously...