Humans are good at recognizing intent. They want to be. When you let them loose on a question, they will try to find an answer with intent, because the expectat

Humans are good at recognizing intent. They want to be. When you let them loose on a question, they will try to find an answer with intent, because the expectation is for there to be intent. Sheer complexity is hard to stomach for us. We must be clear that the only things that make sense are we ourselves, plus the animals we're surrounded by. The animals too are trying hard to make sense of things. Most cannot afford the luxury of developing advanced brains like we did. We can try and calculate the possibility for other "sensible" things in the universe, but that is just idle speculation. We have not the slightest indication of them existing. For our current physics, the question of what lies beyond the beginning of our universe is nonsensical, as we are limited to light-speed. We cannot leave the universe expanding outwards at light-speed. Our perception is limited to that bubble within. When we say that our physical discoveries point to a fine-tuned universe, we're just being proud of our fine-tuned physics. We did figure out a few things about the universe after all. And we're trying really hard to understand something that happened far in the past. Then these intent-people come along and claim it theirs. TLDR: Who created this fine-tuned universe? We did.