3 ms·
There's opportunity costs for those employees for having taken that job rather than another option that may have been on the table at the time. Or having taken
by brongondwana 10y ago
There's opportunity costs for those employees for having taken that job rather than another option that may have been on the table at the time.
Or having taken on additional responsibilities (loan, started a family, etc) based on having the job.
Getting a job that shouldn't have existed and then losing it again isn't zero sum.
- eropple 10y agoAgreed. In my experience, being out of a job six months after starting a new one is a net negative. I can spin a longer break between jobs a lot better than that.